|
Deceit, danger mark U.S. pursuit of new WMD
Aug 4, 2003
(Baltimore Sun op-ed, July 29, 2003)
Illegal biological and nuclear weapons production is on
the rise - in the United States.
Ignoring the internationally-recognized Biological
Weapons Convention, the US Army has patented a new
grenade capable of delivering biological and chemical
agents. Irony wasn't lost on the watchdog group
Sunshine Project which observed, "Hans Blix might have
an easier time finding illegal weapons if he were
inspecting near Baltimore [site of the Army's Edgewood
Arsenal facility, where two of the inventors work]
instead of Baghdad."
The Pentagon's bid to resume biological weapons
research hinges on misleading language: developing
deadly biological weapons is illegal, so the grenade
and other potential biowarfare devices are labeled
"non-lethal."
Similarly misleading language is being used to beef up
the nation's nuclear weapons program. The House and
Senate recently ditched the ban on researching
low-yield nuclear devices, and OK'd funding for the
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator, a weapon ten times
more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. The
justification? Nuclear weapons will only be researched,
not tested or deployed.
Small coincidence that the House and Senate
simultaneously called for accelerated resumption of
stateside underground nuclear testing. The message is
clear; research nuclear weapons today, test and deploy
them tomorrow.
The Bush administration's race to get back into the
biological and nuclear weapons business is alarming in
a world struggling with WMD overload. The secrecy and
downright sloppiness of the US weapons program,
however, raises red flags.
Case in point: a whopping $6 billion has been earmarked
to expand the US biodefense program, and contenders
have already begun to abuse public trust to get their
hands on the cash. Last February for example, the
University of California at Davis (UCD) took a full ten
days to inform nearby communities that a rhesus monkey
had escaped from its primate-breeding facility.
Coincidentally, UCD has been vying for government funds
to set up its own "hot zone" biodefense lab, which in
the future could use primates for biological weapons
testing. What if that monkey had been infected with
ebola, or some other virus? Would the public have been
informed?
Back in Maryland, home of the biowarfare grenade, the
Pentagon recently unearthed over 2,000 tons of
hazardous biological waste, much of it undocumented
leftovers of an abandoned germ warfare program. Nearby,
the FBI is draining a pond for clues into 2001's
anthrax attacks which killed five people.
None of this does much to inspire trust in the US
biological weapons program; unfortunately, the
situation is equally grim with the nation's nukes.
America's most reputable nuclear weapons facility
recently announced it had "lost" two vials of
plutonium; officials at New Mexico's Los Alamos
National Laboratory have said the plutonium was
probably mislabeled then accidentally discarded.
The missing plutonium doesn't bode well. According to
Peter Stockton, senior investigator with the Project on
Government Oversight (POGO), "We have virtually
hundreds of tons of plutonium and enriched uranium in
the system. This raises questions about the reliability
of that system."
Meanwhile, thousands of radioactive materials have been
lost or stolen worldwide and the International Atomic
Energy Agency estimates over 100 countries have
inadequate controls over their radioactive devices.
The bottom line: in such a dubious environment, do we
really need to invest in more homegrown WMD?
Apart from the ethical implications of using biological
and nuclear weapons on civilian populations abroad, we
should consider the stateside risks these weapons
programs create. Taxpayer dollars would be better spent
cleaning up past bioweapon excesses and tracking loose
nukes.
Heather Wokusch is a free-lance writer. She can be
contacted via her web site at www.heatherwokusch.com
"In the face of this approaching disaster, it behooves
men and women not yet overcome by war madness to raise
their voice of protest, to call the attention of the
people to the crime and outrage which are about to be
perpetrated on them."
-- Emma Goldman
|